Would Bills, Lions, Bengals win this division?

[Sascha]

Three of the lesser teams of the 2010 season, the Bengals, Lions and Bills. Compare them to the NFC West, and you have teams with better records, but are they better teams.

Do you think any of these three teams would have won the NFC West this season?

[Champ]

I think the Lions or Bills could. The Bengals have the talent to run away with the NFC West, but seem to get in their own way.

[Dreamers]

It would all depend on who they would have played. I really think right now SL is better then all 3 of them right now. They have a better more reliable QB then any of them, a great RB, and more playmakers on D then any of those teams as well. I think the Bills are under rated and all but they just are not built to have a winning record. As for Cincy I never really bought into them last year so I wasn't shocked by their play this year. The Lions I doubt it. They just do not have a good D and they can't keep their O healthy right now.

[Champ]

The Lions already beat the Rams 44-6, so I'm not sure if I would say they're better.

[TexecutedInTampa]

The Bills could. They'd get to play 6 games in the NFC West, they could do something with that. They could do very well.

[|(evin|(olb|(ritik]

I don't believe in any of those teams to be honest. I mean they've all had their fare share of bad losses this season to teams as bad as those in the NFC West. So whose to say they'd fare that much better than they already are?

Those teams losing has little to do with talent and more to do with organizational dysfunction. Each and every one of them would likely stumble along no differently than they currently do and they'd find a way to screw it up.