PDA

View Full Version : YoHo's 2-Round Mock Draft



YoHoChecko
02-10-2007, 02:24 PM
by
Max Gross

While no future trades were included in this draft, look for possible trades by the Bucs (move back to acquire picks, draft Okoye), the Colts to move back for better DT or LB value and some teams in need of QB to jump up as Quinn and Russell remain available after the top 3 picks are made.

Round 1

1. Raiders - WR Calvin Johnson
Moss is clearly on the way out. Johnson will probably be a bigger impact at the position as a rookie than Moss has been in two years with the team.

2. Lions - OT Joe Thomas
The Lions can't improve until their offensive line improves. Bottom line.

3. Bucs - DE Gaines Adams
Adams can complement Rice for a year until he replaces him.

4. Browns - RB Adrian Peterson
It would be better if Thomas was available, and Branch will be tempting and highly considered, but I think this could be their guy.

5. Cardinals - DT Alan Branch
I think their linebackers are better than they've played. Some help up front from the D line will give them the chance to prove me right.

6. Redskins - DE Jamaal Anderson
The Redskins need help on the D line with the run and the pass rush. Anderson helps with both.

7. Vikings - CB Leon Hall
With Smoot on the way out, they bring in an aggressive, solid-tackling CB with great instincts who should be great in the cover-2

8. Texans - QB JaMarcus Russell
Neither QB can really be considered a can't miss prospect, and none has the immense physical ability to demand being taken right away, thus they fall a bit. With Carr in hot water, Russell becomes too good to pass up.

9. Dolphins - QB Brady Quinn
The Dolphins hope to have finally solved their complicated QB puzzle. The new head coach will have no loyalty to any previously acquired players.

10. Falcons - S Reggie Nelson
Their safeties are bad and/or old. Hall was overrated and needs some deep help. Nelson is a playmaker whose athletic prowess should move him ahead of Landry and into the top ten.

11. 49ers - CB Darrelle Revis
Jarrett becomes very very tempting at this point, but the defensive secondary is actually in worse shape than the passing game, and there's more depth at WR than CB in this draft.

12. Bills - WR Dwayne Jarrett
Jarrett and Lee will serve to create one of the league's best playmaking duos with contrasting, but complementary styles.

13. Rams - DT Amobi Okoye
I wouldn't be surprised if some WRs left in free agency and they considered Ted Ginn here, but as it is, they get some much needed help on the defensive front.

14. Panthers - LB Patrick Willis
Dan Morgan's career is in question, Chris Draft is average. The Panthers need LB help and Willis is the best and most natural one in this draft.

15. Steelers - LB/DE Quentin Moses
Levi Brown is a consideration here, and this pick depends on Tomlin's long-term plans for the defense. But as it stands, Moses can get the Steelers that elite pass rush presence that they've been lacking lately in the 3-4. He can also add bulk and fill a role in the 4-3 if a change is made down the road.

16. Packers - RB Marshawn Lynch
Lynch fits the zone scheme pretty well and the Packers need to upgrade at RB even if free agent Ahman Green sticks around.

17. Jaguars - S LaRon Landry
Another spot where Tedd Ginn is considered, but raw talent at WR isn't their problem, and with an elite prospect like Landry at another high-need position, they choose to pass.

18. Bengals - DE Charles Johnson
High effort, high character pass rushing end could really upgrade the Bengals' front, as the value at DT isn't great here. If Smith sticks around, they may go OLB, but Johnson might be as good of a value as any LB at this spot.

19. Titans - WR Ted Ginn, Jr.
In 2008, Young, Ginn, White could be magic on offense. It's like the X-games version of the Cowboys' triplets from the 90's.

20. Giants - CB Aaron Ross
The makeover in the secondary patched things up about as well as plastic surgery has patched up Joan Rivers.

21. Broncos - DE Adam Carriker
The Broncos' pass rush needs a shot in the arm, and between Carriker and Dumerville, they'll likely have the highest-effort group in the bunch. Fortunately, Carriker has NFL size, too.

22. Cowboys - WR Dwayne Bowe
The value at FS or DT isn't there. They could address the O-line, but they usually don't, so youth to develop behind T.O. and Glenn is the call. If Bowe keeps a clean, positive attitude, but picks up on T.O.'s work habits, he could turn out to be a very similar player.

23. Kansas City - OT Levi Brown
Tough not to address the defense or WR position, but they really struggled at OT last year, and Brown is definitely a first round talent.

24. Patriots - CB Daymeion Hughes
Athletic ballhawk out (Samuel), athletic ballhawk in. Life goes on as usual in New England.

25. Jets - RB Michael Bush
This would depend on a great string of workouts by the newly healed Bush, and may be a bit of a reach, but CB and DT don't have much value here, and Bush is a good complement to Washington and could help bring order to the committee of rushers in Jersey.

26. Eagles - LB Lawrence Timmons
OLB is their biggest need and Timmons seems to be the best. He's got more raw athleticism than Puz, who seems to be losing some momentum despite a solid career.

27. Saints - LB Paul Posluszny
The Saints wanted AJ Hawk last year before Bush showed up. Puz is in the same mold as Hawk, just with a bit more "stiffness" in his movements. His instincts and fire should be able to help him overcome any of those concerns. He seems to always be around the ball.

28. Patriots - LB David Harris
The guy who manned the middle of the nation's toughest collegiate run defense should help toughen up the middle of the Patriots' linebacking corps.

29. Ravens - OG Ben Grubbs
Offensive line is probably the Ravens' greatest need, so they go after a quality guard who might have some ability at OT, too. Blalock and Sears are other options here.

30. Chargers - S Michael Griffin
Meriweather might get some consideration here, as he is very talented and has shown himself to be a leader in many ways, but the character issues will not be tolerated by a GM who has had more than his share of problem children this year and has vowed to clean things up.

31. Bears - WR Robert Meachem
With Muhammed sticking around as the possession receiver and Berrian a perennial deep threat, Meachem has the chance to develop into an all-around WR creating a far more dynamic offense in Chicago

32. Colts - LB Buster Davis
Buster Davis has cried out "Colts" to me throughout most of the season. I'm not comfortable with any other DTs as first rounders, but they might feel differently. In fact, Davis' size might make him available at the end of the second round, if the Colts still had their pick there.

Round 2

33. Raiders - OT Joe Staley
The Raiders won't b able to make much use of Calvin Johnson if the QB doesn't have time to throw the ball.

34. Lions - DE Jarvis Moss
Adding a pass rusher to an underrated defense could improve it greatly. Especially if they lose inside rusher, free agent Cory Redding.

35. Browns - OG/OT Justin Blalock
Like the Raiders, the line has to be fixed to make use of their stud first round pick. Though with few remaining NTs available, they may regret passing on Branch in round one.

36. Bucs - WR Sidney Rice
Gruden won't be able to resist a potential offensive weapon like this, who should be ready to step into a starter's role by the time Joey Galloway calls it quits.

37. Jets - CB Chris Houston
Houston was an underrated prospect throughout the season who is getting noticed lately. He could immediately contend for a starting spot on the Jets.

38. Cardinals - OG/OT Arron Sears
The Cardinals need help along the offensive line, and Sears could be fit into a G or tackle spot, depending on which he performs better at in camp and where the need arises.

39. Texans - OT Tony Ugoh
The trend early in round two seems to be offensive line. Is it any coincidence that all of these teams with bad lines have early picks?

40. Dolphins - OLB Jon Beason
A WR would be ideal, and Gonzales could merit some thought here, but the defense still could be upgraded at the LB positions and that position may have better value at this point.

41. Vikings - TE Zach Miller
Again a WR could be ideal, but all the same, the Vikings at an offensive weapon at a need position. Wiggins is solid, but he's not the athletic TE that thrives in the West Coast Offense. Miller could add a nice dimension to their offense.

42. 49ers - OLB/DE Lamar Woodley
For the third selection in a row, Gonzales merits consideration, and if he were to go, this might be the spot. However, Woodley possesses an athleticism and play-making ability that their defense is currently lacking. Don't forget, Mike Nolan is a defensive coach.

43. Bills - CB Marcus McCauley
Likely to lose Nate Clements, the Bills could be in the market for a CB and McCauley, despite a sub-par senior season, has all the right tools. The Bills will gamble on whether or not he can put them together to become the player they expect him to be.

44. Falcons - DT Tank Tyler
A young, fat, lazy DT to rotate in behind an old, fat, lazy DT (Grady Jackson).

45. Panthers - S Brandon Meriweather
Adding Willis and Meriweather to a defense rich with talent should help return the unit to elite status.

46. Steelers - OG/OT Marshall Yanda
Back to the nitty-gritty, now, where their true need lies, the Steelers add a versatile member to help along the offensive line, coming out of the well-coached Iowa Hawkeyes program.

47. Packers - S Eric Weddle
Last season, the Packers' young safety regressed while their new, veteran safety struggled in communicating the secondary calls. Weddle is just the sort of bright, coachable player they need to keep Collins in the right place and add another play-making element to their secondary.

48. Jaguars - WR Anthony Gonzales
All of the Jaguars' WRs are big, physical players. Since that hasn't worked, they'll get a clutch, fast, but slight WR into the fold. He should finally provide a reliable target for whomeve ends up quarterbacking this team.

49. Bengals - DT Brandon Mebane
The Bengals continue to bolster the defensive line, because everything starts up front when improving a defense.

50. Titans - CB Tanard Jackson
Jackson is a lesser-known prospect who could challenge Reynaldo Hill for the spot opposite Jones, helping solidify a young secondary.

51. Giants - RB Kenny Irons
What better than a slight RB with explosive acceleration to complement Brandon Jacobs? Irons is a great value here and could start eventually, if the Brandon Jacobs experiment doesn't work out.

52. Rams - OLB Rufus Alexander
The Rams add another body to their defensive front seven, here. Let's hope they re-sign Kevin Curtis, for their sake.

53. Cowboys - OG Manuel Ramirez
The Cowboys desperately need help along the offensive line, and starting in the second round is a pretty good way to go about that venture.

54. Chiefs - DT Justin Harrell
Harrell would likely be ranked a bit higher if not for an injury as a senior. The Chiefs need help with their run defense and their front seven overall.

55. Seahawks - DE Victor Abiamiri
Despite having good overall sack numbers, the Seahawks could use a well-built DE to rotate in behind aging Wistrom and Fisher. Abiamiri gives them just that.

56. Broncos - RB Tony Hunt
Hunt helped himself as much as almost anyone during Senior Bowl week, and many feel he is a good fit in the one-cut, upfield running style of the zone blocking scheme.

57. Eagles - FB/RB Brian Leonard
Leonard is versatile, coachable and a perfect fi for the Eagles. He can contribute as a blocker, a power runner complimentary to Westbrook and as a very good receiving threat out of the backfield--one of the more important duties of a west coast offense FB.

58. Saints - CB Josh Wilson
Wilson will be a workout riser as he is likely one of the fastest players in this year's draft. The Saints need youth and depth and speed at CB. Seems like a happy marriage.

59. Jets - TE Greg Olsen
With no big, run stuffing DTs to take Robertson's place as a NT, the Jets look for other ways to improve their team, and a dynamic TE like Olsen makes the best fit, pulling some attention away from the underrated Coles and Cotchery.

60. Patriots - OLB/DE Anthony Spencer
Spencer could go higher than this, but if the Patriots are able to add a young CB, ILB and pass-rushing OLB on draft day, it would have to be viewed as a success. WR and S still loom as needs on the horizon, but revitalizing the defense with youth and talent will go a long way for this team.

61. Ravens - OLB Earl Everett
This is assuming that Adalius Thomas leaves in free agency, creating a void at a starting LB spot. Everett would make a good choice for that role. If Thomas sticks around, look for Troy Smith here.

62. Chargers - ILB Brandon Siler
Again, a free agency assumption, with Donnie Edwards possibly on the way out, but even so, he's aging and the Chargers need youth on the interior of their 3-4 alignment.

63. Bears - LB Stewart Bradley
It's funny how things seem to come in bunches in this draft. Another LB departure in free agency creates another need. Bradley is probably a slight reach, but with few other pressing needs, they fill the void.

64. Bucs - DT Ryan McBean
McBean is an undersized DT that's rising up some draft boards and could fill the 3-technique tackle spot continuing to infuse youth onto the Bucs' defensive line.

Chris Raiden
02-10-2007, 03:12 PM
Dropping the quarterbacks, unrealistic, but I love it.

As for the Browns picks, with an offensive lineman drafted in the second, I can live with the pick of Peterson and consider myself elated to have an elite running back (and free up a few million in cap room for 2008 when Droughns is almost undoubtedly cut after '07).

Overall, a well thought out and solid job of evaluating.

-RD

myshkingfh
02-10-2007, 03:20 PM
Just fine on the Bronco picks!

YoHoChecko
02-10-2007, 03:22 PM
Just fine on the Bronco picks!

Haha, you guys are so responsive on every mock draft, it's hard not to know what the Broncos are looking at around PSH d-:

GIANT PIGEON
02-10-2007, 04:29 PM
11. 49ers - CB Darrelle Revis
Jarrett becomes very very tempting at this point, but the defensive secondary is actually in worse shape than the passing game, and there's more depth at WR than CB in this draft.

With both Clements ands Asante Samuel likely hitting free agency, its very hard for me not to see the 49ers get one of them. That being said a name thats been brought up lately has been Adam Carriker, yes i know he may be a bit of a reach at this point, but with Bryant Young pondering retirement we need someone to play DE in the 3-4 and Carriker has the size and athleticism to be succesful there


42. 49ers - OLB/DE Lamar Woodley
For the third selection in a row, Gonzales merits consideration, and if he were to go, this might be the spot. However, Woodley possesses an athleticism and play-making ability that their defense is currently lacking. Don't forget, Mike Nolan is a defensive coach.

Woodley had a very bad Senior Bowl week and I have my doubts about him, Anthony Spencer would be a much better pick here IMO as a OLB...if not an OLB Meriweather and Weddle will get very strong looks here to improve the secondary

datruth55
02-10-2007, 04:33 PM
Boy would I love to get Beason in the second round. That would be sweet.

Wolverine
02-10-2007, 04:37 PM
Woodley was hurt Senior Bowl week, I wouldn't worry.

GIANT PIGEON
02-10-2007, 04:41 PM
Woodley was hurt Senior Bowl week, I wouldn't worry.


from nfldraftcountdown
4. LaMarr Woodley, DE, Michigan
Really struggled early on and then had to drop out of the game with an injury.


either way i think Spencer is the better athlete and would bring more in terms of pass rushing from the OLB spot

YoHoChecko
02-10-2007, 05:08 PM
With both Clements ands Asante Samuel likely hitting free agency, its very hard for me not to see the 49ers get one of them. That being said a name thats been brought up lately has been Adam Carriker, yes i know he may be a bit of a reach at this point, but with Bryant Young pondering retirement we need someone to play DE in the 3-4 and Carriker has the size and athleticism to be succesful there
Two guys hitting the market... 15 teams with at least $20 million in cap dollars. And it's hard for you to see one of only TWO guys not ending up there? Maybe it will happen, I'm not saying it won't, but until they sign, I'm not going to give any team credit for getting them, considering they'll probably be the two most hotly sought after free agents on the market this year

As for Carriker, if you wanted him, I think you'd best trade back a bit... but he would be a good 3-4 DE fit.

As for Woodley/Spencer, I have Woodley/Spencer and even Gaines Adams all in sort of a tie pending combine numbers right now, and the range of where they're selected is so wide only because there are fewer 3-4 teams seeking pass rushers as a top priority right now

GIANT PIGEON
02-10-2007, 05:20 PM
Two guys hitting the market... 15 teams with at least $20 million in cap dollars. And it's hard for you to see one of only TWO guys not ending up there? Maybe it will happen, I'm not saying it won't, but until they sign, I'm not going to give any team credit for getting them, considering they'll probably be the two most hotly sought after free agents on the market this year

As for Carriker, if you wanted him, I think you'd best trade back a bit... but he would be a good 3-4 DE fit.

As for Woodley/Spencer, I have Woodley/Spencer and even Gaines Adams all in sort of a tie pending combine numbers right now, and the range of where they're selected is so wide only because there are fewer 3-4 teams seeking pass rushers as a top priority right now

With $37.5 million in cap space, and the fact that Nolan wants to build his front 7 through the draft, yes its hard for me not to see one of them end up in San Fran. But i understand your point.

Carriker seems to be a hot commodity lately, but a deal i've heard rumored is between the 49ers and Panthers to switch the 11th overall and 14th overall picks and the Panthers would send over Maake Kemoeatu(who may be a cap casualty if he isn't dealt, but unlike in Carolina he'd fit perfectly at NT for the 49ers in the 3-4), Carriker at 14th would make more sense at the moment

Schaddy
02-10-2007, 06:19 PM
Good stuff, Yoho

I dunno how I'd react to the Pack taking Weddle in the 2nd - I'm definitely a fan of the guy, but I hope we're looking to upgrade the receiving corps in the early rounds.

I keep telling myself that I like Marshawn Lynch, because everyone says that's who we'll take, but I still don't like him all that much. Oh well, if we get him and he turns into a stud I guess I won't have a problem with him LOL

YoHoChecko
02-10-2007, 07:21 PM
Good stuff, Yoho

I dunno how I'd react to the Pack taking Weddle in the 2nd - I'm definitely a fan of the guy, but I hope we're looking to upgrade the receiving corps in the early rounds.

I keep telling myself that I like Marshawn Lynch, because everyone says that's who we'll take, but I still don't like him all that much. Oh well, if we get him and he turns into a stud I guess I won't have a problem with him LOL

Just know that this mock does not represent what I WANT for the Packers, though I do want Weddle (he's not a priority for me). I don't really want Lynch thatbadly, myself. I'd rather them trade back. But with Jarrett off the board, if they stay at 16, Lynch is the best option. I think he'd be a good fit and I think the Packers need a good young RB, so it makes sense, but I'd rather them add extra day one picks with a swap backwards.

Also, if I did a third round, I'd take Jacoby Jones in the 3rd and/or David Ball in the 4th, 2 WRs that would be useful for the Pack (Ball more immeditaely).

Here are the things I feel strangest about with my mock:
-The Bills got no O-linemen
-The 49ers and Vikings got no WRs
-The Jets didn't get help in the defensive front 7
-Anthony Spencer drops uch farther than likely
-Too many LBs go in the first two rounds
-No Ryan Kalil. (anyone need a C more than the guy I picked for them?)

Crunked
02-10-2007, 07:34 PM
Love it, almost every mock is going with a LB for the Colts, I do not agree for reasons I have stated repeatedly but anything is possible....On a side note this will make for a week of interesting reading for our members, as this weeks Turf Toe Mocks the Mockers.....present company excluded of course ;)

YoHoChecko
02-10-2007, 07:41 PM
Love it, almost every mock is going with a LB for the Colts, I do not agree for reasons I have stated repeatedly but anything is possible....On a side note this will make for a week of interesting reading for our members, as this weeks Turf Toe Mocks the Mockers.....present company excluded of course ;)

If you read the first paragraph, you'll see that I noted that the Colts may trade back to get better value at LB or DT. There just wasn't a DT worth taking in the first to me right there. You got a suggestion?

Besides, I know that you know your team, but I don't really like the idea of Mathis making a position switch considering how well he does getting after the QB from the DE position.

And moreso, as my dad pointed out, with Buster Davis in the middle, even Bob Sanders can still see over him into the backfield to get a read on the play.

Crunked
02-10-2007, 10:42 PM
If you read the first paragraph, you'll see that I noted that the Colts may trade back to get better value at LB or DT. There just wasn't a DT worth taking in the first to me right there. You got a suggestion?

Besides, I know that you know your team, but I don't really like the idea of Mathis making a position switch considering how well he does getting after the QB from the DE position.

And moreso, as my dad pointed out, with Buster Davis in the middle, even Bob Sanders can still see over him into the backfield to get a read on the play.

I was impressed with your assertions, and really anything can happen, the Colts have 2 LB'ers that probably should have started this year but Dungy wanted to stay with experience over athletic ability..the problem....is, the Colts are set at MLB, which ironically these two young guys are, so we essentially have 3 starting caliber MLB and no weak or strong side candidates, now most likely the two young guys will be cross trained to weak and strong side, or they will draft someone for those roles, but yeah the problem is there are more good MLB for our system around the end of round 1, and its not what we need. I really think the first most likely thing we do, is trade down and try to pick up an extra draft pick...if that doesn't happen because they cant get a trade down they like then they simply take the best defensive candidate available, with a tiny tiny outside chance if a phenomenal O Line guy is there they take him....but until free agency shakes out a little bit there are just too many variables to peg EXACTLY which way they go.......................

Blackmallard
02-11-2007, 12:08 AM
If you read the first paragraph, you'll see that I noted that the Colts may trade back to get better value at LB or DT. There just wasn't a DT worth taking in the first to me right there. You got a suggestion?

Besides, I know that you know your team, but I don't really like the idea of Mathis making a position switch considering how well he does getting after the QB from the DE position.

And moreso, as my dad pointed out, with Buster Davis in the middle, even Bob Sanders can still see over him into the backfield to get a read on the play.

Crunked is right that it is unlikely that the Colts will take a LB with the 32nd pick, but really they may well use it to aquire a LB via a trade back, so I don't mind having it listed that way. The kind of guys they want at LB are always available later in the draft.

YoHoChecko
02-11-2007, 12:14 AM
Yeah, as I said, if you guys can think of a DT that you'd rather have at 32, let me know; there aren't any worth it, in my opinion. And I do think that the defensive front 7, minus DE, will have to be their top targets, so that leaves LBs and DTs (though apparently not MLBs, oops).

Blackmallard
02-11-2007, 12:27 AM
Yeah, as I said, if you guys can think of a DT that you'd rather have at 32, let me know; there aren't any worth it, in my opinion. And I do think that the defensive front 7, minus DE, will have to be their top targets, so that leaves LBs and DTs (though apparently not MLBs, oops).

I think they will go for a DB or WR if they use the pick, or they will trade back and get multiple later picks to fill out the LB core and DB's. If Simon, McFarland, and Reagor are all going to be on the team then DT isn't even really a need this year after all.

No one is talking about the possibility that they pick up a WR, but I could see it this year if the right guy falls. They are short on depth, they did not really have anyone who could be effective in Stokley's place this year except Clark, and ideally the offense runs three WR's AND Clark a lot of the time. If they get the next Reggie Wayne the timing would work out that Marvin Harrison would be getting near retirement right around when the new guy would be ready to emerge. I definitely see the Colts starting to look at first round WR's by next year.

Since its way too complicated to project who they will trade the pick with its probably fine to project them as taking a LB with it since there is a good chance that they will get a LB with the pick just by trading back.

Ball_Hawks
02-11-2007, 02:15 AM
You think Seattle takes a DE 2 years in a row in the 2nd round? Remember Tapp was drafted last year.

Its hard to tell what Ruskell does cause he picks players you dont expect to be taken in that round. Also it depends on the FA's they keep or let go..

have 3 starts as FA's.. Hamlin,Stevens & Gray.. So FS,TE, RG..Their is also need at DT with Tubbs being injury prone. Them 4 are the biggest needs i belive.

YoHoChecko
02-11-2007, 02:33 AM
You think Seattle takes a DE 2 years in a row in the 2nd round? Remember Tapp was drafted last year.

Its hard to tell what Ruskell does cause he picks players you dont expect to be taken in that round. Also it depends on the FA's they keep or let go..

have 3 starts as FA's.. Hamlin,Stevens & Gray.. So FS,TE, RG..Their is also need at DT with Tubbs being injury prone. Them 4 are the biggest needs i belive.

The DTs in the draft are not good enough or numerous enough to fill the needs for all those who need them. As far as TE and S, I figured that they might keep Stevens and Hamlin, instead of allow them to walk, creating new needs.

Now, for DE, Tapp is a very under-sized player... also, there's this, dated in late November:
DE- Need a DE with some size. Wistrom & Fisher old and under sized.

Tennessee_Stud
02-11-2007, 10:40 AM
Fisher already stated that the Titans will go heavy defense in the draft this year, so the selection of Ted Ginn seems ludicrous to me. Adam Carriker would be my choice, putting in a great runstopper and good pass rusher on a weak def line.

YoHoChecko
02-11-2007, 10:49 AM
Fisher already stated that the Titans will go heavy defense in the draft this year, so the selection of Ted Ginn seems ludicrous to me. Adam Carriker would be my choice, putting in a great runstopper and good pass rusher on a weak def line.

Cariiker would make a lot of sense, since the young pass rushers from the draft a couple years ago have yet to produce, but I think "ludicrous" is a rather strong word for the selection of Ginn. He's likely to go a lot higher than that, and I'm sure Tennessee may not be expecting him, but it's undeniable that WR is one of their biggest needs, and there are few guys on the free agent market of any substance. Young is going to need weapons to succeed, and right now, he doesn't have much. They need to build up the offense around Young or they're sentencing him to years of mediocre results.

lawdog93
02-12-2007, 07:05 PM
Haha, you guys are so responsive on every mock draft, it's hard not to know what the Broncos are looking at around PSH d-:


I think we need to take a CB in the first. :p

R8drTahoe
02-12-2007, 07:10 PM
This is the best Mock that I've seen so far. Good job man.

YoHoChecko
02-12-2007, 07:14 PM
This is the best Mock that I've seen so far. Good job man.

Why thank you, but let's be honest. You're just stoked the Raiders don't take JaMarcus Russell like in every other mock d-:

Dreamers
02-12-2007, 07:39 PM
25. Jets - RB Michael Bush
This would depend on a great string of workouts by the newly healed Bush, and may be a bit of a reach, but CB and DT don't have much value here, and Bush is a good complement to Washington and could help bring order to the committee of rushers in Jersey.

I can see what you where trying to do in the first. It gives a lot to think about. Bush in the 1st has got to be a joke thow and you realy think there are no DT's wearth taking here. I would't mind Justin Harrell but I'd rather a LB or WR in this mock.


37. Jets - CB Chris Houston
Houston was an underrated prospect throughout the season who is getting noticed lately. He could immediately contend for a starting spot on the Jets.
If Houson falls to the second I can understand this pick but still not thrilled about it. We have much bigger needs here olb, ilb, nt, wr, de, and ot.


59. Jets - TE Greg Olsen
With no big, run stuffing DTs to take Robertson's place as a NT, the Jets look for other ways to improve their team, and a dynamic TE like Olsen makes the best fit, pulling some attention away from the underrated Coles and Cotchery.

underrated Coles
underrated Coles What??? He is the highest paid player on our team if you don't count Martin. If you want him you can have him. As for TE I thought we stole Pociask in last years draft. We picked up Sean Ryan, resigned Baker and have 3 other prospects at TE. I really can't see this as a priority in the 2nd but Olson is a quality pick.

YoHoChecko
02-12-2007, 08:27 PM
Dreamers, what can I say? I agree, the Jets' draft is by far the one in my mock that I dislike the least.

However, I stand by my contention that there is no DT worth taking in the first round at that point. And Michael Bush was widely considered a lock for the first round prior to breaking his leg several months ago. He should be healthy in time for the season, and if McGahee can blow out his knee and be a first round draft pick, Bush can suffer a far less damaging injury and maintain his original status, depending on his workouts.

I do wish I had been able to fill their needs in the defensive front. There really isn't a quality NT in this draft that I can find. Tank Tyler might be but he's lazy. I could have done that.

By the way, Houston is someone to be excited about.

As far as Coles goes, he is underrated by the majority of people around the league. If you think he is simply expendible to the Jets, then I have less faith in your judgement than I thought I did. And none of the TEs you mentioned are weapons. They just fill a role. They will get a job done, but they don't have to be accounted for. Olsen would help the passing game.

But overall, I know this draft doesn't meet the Jets' main needs. The picks didn't fall right for me for them.