PDA

View Full Version : The 2006 PSH Fantasy Football Guide



Wolverine
08-01-2006, 12:23 PM
The 2006 PSH Fantasy Football Guide is your one stop for all information on the upcoming Fantasy Football season. Wolverine covers everything from Sleepers, Busts and the growing impact of two-RB systems in the NFL and it's change in Fantasy Football and who will win the Battles.

JungleKing
08-01-2006, 10:03 PM
This is going to sound like me being a homer, and I partly am, but why do you have Vick ahead of Delhomme? This is fantasy football. Just numbers. Vick had 3009 total yards last year. That's less than Jake had passing. Vick had more attempts, less yards, less touchdowns. Stop ranking him highly.

Wolverine
08-02-2006, 12:12 AM
I will be honest with you...

I wouldn't pick either one. I hate Delhomme's picks and I hate Vick's inconsistent passing games.

But I think Vick is set for a bigger year. He has been working with Roddy White in the off-season, he is in his 3rd year in the West Coast(and according to Steve Young, who played in it.. This is the comfort year).

You could make a case for either guy being ahead of the other. Everyones come on here and argued their homer picks, and what not and for their guys. I mean I can see what you mean, but it's my opinion that Vick will have a better year. In this case, I don't really care what they did last year, because that's not what it comes down to in this instance.

chiefzilla
08-05-2006, 10:27 AM
Well, two things to keep in mind with both:

Both have tough schedules.

I'll side with JungleKing on this one. Delhomme has a strong history of producing against good defenses. Vick has a pretty lousy one: he has an elite history against bad to slightly average defenses, but has a pretty bad one against real good ones. Vick looks like he may improve over the offseason but he's still got a LOT to prove, IMO. Because I was one of the only people in the world that knew last year would happen: it's easy to make the playoffs coasting on an easy schedule.


As for sleepers, let me throw in a sleeper and you can throw in your two cents. Samie Parker, WR, Chiefs. Not a guy you want to pick in the early rounds, but a guy you should definitely swing for in the late rounds. He's in the year where WRs tend to explode. And if you look at his numbers last year, barring injury, they would've been very solid. Keep in mind, also, that he became Green's most trusted target in clutch situations because he was real good at securing the ball. He's also got deep threat potential. I really think he could be good for 8-900 yards this year with a decent share of TDs, mostly of the home run variety.



I will be honest with you...

I wouldn't pick either one. I hate Delhomme's picks and I hate Vick's inconsistent passing games.

But I think Vick is set for a bigger year. He has been working with Roddy White in the off-season, he is in his 3rd year in the West Coast(and according to Steve Young, who played in it.. This is the comfort year).

You could make a case for either guy being ahead of the other. Everyones come on here and argued their homer picks, and what not and for their guys. I mean I can see what you mean, but it's my opinion that Vick will have a better year. In this case, I don't really care what they did last year, because that's not what it comes down to in this instance.

Wolverine
08-05-2006, 10:36 AM
Well, two things to keep in mind with both:

Both have tough schedules.

I'll side with JungleKing on this one. Delhomme has a strong history of producing against good defenses. Vick has a pretty lousy one: he has an elite history against bad to slightly average defenses, but has a pretty bad one against real good ones. Vick looks like he may improve over the offseason but he's still got a LOT to prove, IMO. Because I was one of the only people in the world that knew last year would happen: it's easy to make the playoffs coasting on an easy schedule.


As for sleepers, let me throw in a sleeper and you can throw in your two cents. Samie Parker, WR, Chiefs. Not a guy you want to pick in the early rounds, but a guy you should definitely swing for in the late rounds. He's in the year where WRs tend to explode. And if you look at his numbers last year, barring injury, they would've been very solid. Keep in mind, also, that he became Green's most trusted target in clutch situations because he was real good at securing the ball. He's also got deep threat potential. I really think he could be good for 8-900 yards this year with a decent share of TDs, mostly of the home run variety.

Point well taken on the QB thing..

Absolutely with Samie Parker.. Since Rashaun Woods got booted off the face of the earth, Id for sure put Parker there.. He is the 2 option in a big offense.